Hi Richard,
Thanks for the thoughts about the definition and I am absolutely sure our understanding of top-down/bottom-up will become more refined and/or change as we learn more. I mean it’s a very rudimentary shorthand way of thinking about neural processes, but I guess shorthand has an important function.
I like “natural inclination” but also feel motivational schema is a better technical term describing the underlying neural architecture that is the origin of approach/avoid behaviour. If we were to think of motivational schemata as one of the mechanisms by which approach/avoid behaviour, what might the other mechanisms be? (that’s an honest question, I want to know what other drivers there are - maybe it’s a quantum answer?).
Anyway, let’s keep hashing it out! If we keep it fluid and open to change, then it’s going to have a chance of keeping up with the rapid advances in our knowledge and staying relevant.